|
Post by Sentar(Spade) on Sept 19, 2013 23:37:59 GMT
In the encounter I ruled that cheat death only saved him from a single lethal blow and hemata continued to multilateral his body I ruled him dead.
|
|
|
Post by hunterkiller725 on Sept 19, 2013 23:49:24 GMT
In the encounter I ruled that cheat death only saved him from a single lethal blow and hemata continued to multilateral his body I ruled him dead. thats not how hero points work if he spends the 2 he MUST survive the encounter
|
|
|
Post by Ror'Nor on Sept 20, 2013 0:11:52 GMT
In the encounter I ruled that cheat death only saved him from a single lethal blow and hemata continued to multilateral his body I ruled him dead. thats not how hero points work if he spends the 2 he MUST survive the encounter I'm pretty sure it says "How this plays out is up to the GM,but generally the character is left alive" So this could prevent one blow from death like spade ruled or completely revive someone like Clout suggested.
|
|
|
Post by Silver on Sept 20, 2013 1:31:48 GMT
I agree with what hunter said. If "continuing to mutilate" was allowed, then cheat death would be worthless, seeing as a BBEG is very very likely to do something to you even after you die, same thing with animals. Imagine I use a hero point in a fight vs Lions. Think they will stop eating me?
|
|
|
Post by Ror'Nor on Sept 20, 2013 2:09:22 GMT
I was just clarifying that his statement wasn't 100% correct. I personally rather not see hero points be used to bring people back from death.
|
|