cybernx
Blackwater Pirate
Posts: 382
|
Post by cybernx on Sept 3, 2013 1:00:20 GMT
Normal: ANY Movement Cost MP according to current rules. docs.google.com/file/d/0BwYdWgkObduKdTVLS1B1eks5X0U/edit pg 12 Proposed Change: Units with enhanced movement may as a standard movement on Hexes that are Plains or Desert move multiple hexes according to the chart below. On Hexes that are Mountain or Forest AND Border a Plains or Desert Hex on AT LEAST 2 sides you can move as tho you were one tire lower in mount speed. The Standard Cost will be determined by the Hex of Destination. Restrictions: A parties movement is restricted to the slowest members movement and this rule will not affect movement on Swamp, Jungle or Water Hexes, Only methods of Ground Based Mount Movement are affected by this rule, Including those that Haul Items such as carts or wagons Mount Speed
| Terrain
| Hexes Can Move
| Less than 50 | Any | Normal | 50 to 70 | Plains or Desert | UP TO 2 Hexes | 71 and Up | Plains or Desert | UP TO 3 Hexes | Less than 50 | Any | Normal | 50 to 70 | Mountain or Forest W/ Border of 2 Plains or Desert | Normal | 71 and Up | Mountain or Forest W/ Border of 2 Plains or Desert | UP TO 2 Hexes |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 3:33:50 GMT
So horses are 50 and things have to be 51+ to get increased hex movement?
|
|
|
Post by Magistrate Wizzle on Sept 3, 2013 6:22:43 GMT
It is apparent players are looking for a change in movement speeds. Us magistrates will work on a new method and present it for a vote. Please give us time to do this. We will try to have it by Friday reset.
|
|
cybernx
Blackwater Pirate
Posts: 382
|
Post by cybernx on Sept 3, 2013 12:28:37 GMT
Obviously I messed up there but this was done off your suggestion and there was time for you to look at it. Horses should be in the second teir. Ill fix it and repost.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 15:06:34 GMT
Sounds like an interesting idea and it makes sense. Also gives people a reason to want to buy horses and items for increased movemens. I think the Sultanate needs to get some flying carpets... Just saying. :-D
|
|
|
Post by Magistrate Wizzle on Sept 3, 2013 15:13:55 GMT
As mentioned before. Us magistrates will present a solution.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 15:14:09 GMT
Sounds like an interesting idea and it makes sense. Also gives people a reason to want to buy horses and items for increased movemens. I think the Sultanate needs to get some flying carpets... Just saying. :-D "A WHOLE NEW WORLD!!!!!!" Back on topic though, I think this proposal is fair, however I wish to see the proposal of the magistrate before I make my vote on the issue.
|
|
cybernx
Blackwater Pirate
Posts: 382
|
Post by cybernx on Sept 3, 2013 16:12:39 GMT
As mentioned before. Us magistrates will present a solution. Yes I read that, and as can be accurately judged by my having re-posted the poll after you or another magistrate blatantly abused your authority by locking it. I am choosing to ignore you.
|
|
cybernx
Blackwater Pirate
Posts: 382
|
Post by cybernx on Sept 3, 2013 16:15:17 GMT
Sounds like an interesting idea and it makes sense. Also gives people a reason to want to buy horses and items for increased movemens. I think the Sultanate needs to get some flying carpets... Just saying. :-D "A WHOLE NEW WORLD!!!!!!" Back on topic though, I think this proposal is fair, however I wish to see the proposal of the magistrate before I make my vote on the issue. I should wish you to vote on this one as the magistrates did not start talking about proposals until I posted this one in the Discussion thread. It started with Spade and now Wizzle is getting involved.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 17:01:00 GMT
Well it has been discussed quite a bit both me and hemata made a thread on it before. I think the GMs are feeling like this is an issue and they need to fix it, I think your proposal is great, but the GMs might want to broaden it. They have been picky about how this should be worded in the past.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 17:05:39 GMT
"A WHOLE NEW WORLD!!!!!!" Back on topic though, I think this proposal is fair, however I wish to see the proposal of the magistrate before I make my vote on the issue. I should wish you to vote on this one as the magistrates did not start talking about proposals until I posted this one in the Discussion thread. It started with Spade and now Wizzle is getting involved. I dunno. I'm with Malcolm here. Seems premature to jump the gun when the GMs said they will work on it and get a proposal back to us for consideration. Seems if we vote before a proposal is offered it won't mean anything anyway. We should give the GM's some time to work on this like they asked.
|
|
cybernx
Blackwater Pirate
Posts: 382
|
Post by cybernx on Sept 3, 2013 17:11:36 GMT
Well it has been discussed quite a bit both me and hemata made a thread on it before. I think the GMs are feeling like this is an issue and they need to fix it, I think your proposal is great, but the GMs might want to broaden it. They have been picky about how this should be worded in the past. And were was all this sudden input from the Magistrate then? If they want it then they can do it the same as everyone else instead of stomping all over they way things are supposed to be done. Spade did not start his shit till i put the discussion up and it drew directly from my proposal then. and wizzle only started after I put this one to vote and he has done nothing but hamper the process. If they wanted to make their own proposal then they could ether wait till thes one was done or or start a secondary one. No one else can lock a poll if they don't like it why should they be able to abuse their power and do so.
|
|
cybernx
Blackwater Pirate
Posts: 382
|
Post by cybernx on Sept 3, 2013 17:14:37 GMT
I should wish you to vote on this one as the magistrates did not start talking about proposals until I posted this one in the Discussion thread. It started with Spade and now Wizzle is getting involved. I dunno. I'm with Malcolm here. Seems premature to jump the gun when the GMs said they will work on it and get a proposal back to us for consideration. Seems if we vote before a proposal is offered it won't mean anything anyway. We should give the GM's some time to work on this like they asked. I did not jump the gun, They blew in late and decided they wanted all the glory.
|
|
|
Post by Magistrate Wizzle on Sept 3, 2013 19:07:05 GMT
I do under understand where glory comes into this first of all.
And the reason I have not made any input was because I liked where your inputs were going.
The reason I have locked the pull is because this would be a major change in the game and thus must be worded exactly to avoid any loopholes. If such a change were to happen in the game I would also want it to include all mounts and vehicles.
I like your proposal but find it to narrow in its ranges.
There is also a vote on what types of terrain should hamper a mounts movement, I have not closed that one because it can still aid.
Please do not jump to conclusions that I do things out of malice or spite. I just do it for the betterment of Calidor.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2013 20:45:01 GMT
Well it has been discussed quite a bit both me and hemata made a thread on it before. I think the GMs are feeling like this is an issue and they need to fix it, I think your proposal is great, but the GMs might want to broaden it. They have been picky about how this should be worded in the past. Yes, this is my opinion as well. I'd pretty okay with your idea, but at the same time I want to see the GM proposal and if they can't offer us anything better then I'd most likely say yes to this.
|
|